Shortly after releasing the 30 under 30 list, Forbes preempted the expected backlash with a column, “Where are The Women in Forbes ’30 under 30′?.”
From the title, you might think that Forbes was apologizing for their oversight in failing to include a representative sample of women for 11 out of 12 featured fields. But you would be wrong. According to Forbes, women are notably absent from the 4 tech-related lists because they “fail to make their mark on Forbes editors.” In other words, we noticed, we thought about it, and we published it anyway. And the other 7 fields? Apparently, 29% raises no eyebrows among the Forbes editorial staff. Surely our readers will applaud the fact that we are recognizing so many young female rockstars!

© 2008 ChristopherTitzer
So what, pray tell, should we women do differently next time? Simple. Just “crush it,” “speak up,” and “enlist a director of marketing.” Sounds eerily similar to the advice that Forbes so generously doled out to those “poor black kids” earlier this month.
Chick, filleted.
Tags: arts, business, careers, law, media, science, sexism, tech, women
Why Would a Woman Take the LSAT?
22 DecWhile browsing through “Above the Law,” a blog by and for lawyers, we came across the article Boobs v. Brains, which depicts the saga of a woman who requested (and was denied) an extra 15 minutes of break time to pump milk for her baby during the LSAT. Her appeal rested on the fact that her breasts become painfully engorged without regular lactation every 3 hours.
The comments on the article quickly turned into a troll-fest:

Glad to see that anonymous woman-bashing is still a favorite pastime of so many up-and-coming members of the educated power elite.
Chick, filleted.
Tags: blogs, breastfeeding, careers, health, law, LSAT, mothers, pregnancy, stereotypes, women